PART THREE
“This is the poor man’s nuclear weapon; you
don’t need a Tomahawk missile, this phenomenon is better. If a suicide bomber
decides at the last minute he can turn 90 degrees from his target, to a new
one, this is very powerful.”[36]
We can deny from our live that I sure the terrorism
will never end in this live, event in Indonesia and the other country, I don’t
know why it is happen but suicide bombing and the suicide bomber are not the
only one way that have to do , whereas many people don’t like it. I don’t know
who is the suicide bomber?
And Terrorism is not a new phenomenon of recent years,
nor is the use of suicide attacks as a new tactical development. The sacrifice
of one’s life for a cause has a historical basis that goes back to ancient
times. In order to gain a solid understanding of the suicide terrorism threat
our military faces today, it is useful to understand the historical background
of this terrorist action. However, since there are numerous definitions of
suicide terrorism, the first portion of this section examines the various
definitions of suicide. The remainder of the section examines the origins of
suicide terrorism and traces its evolvement into the twenty-first century.
Abstract
Objective:
To review the experience of a large-volume trauma
center in managing and treating casualties of suicide bombing attacks.
Summary Background Data:
The threat of suicide bombing attacks has escalated
worldwide. The ability of the suicide bomber to deliver a relatively large
explosive load accompanied by heavy shrapnel to the proximity of his or her
victims has caused devastating effects.
Methods:
The authors reviewed and analyzed the experience
obtained in treating victims of suicide bombings at the level I trauma center
of the Hadassah University Hospital in Jerusalem, Israel from 2000 to 2003.
Results:
Evacuation is usually rapid due to the urban setting
of these attacks. Numerous casualties are brought into the emergency department
over a short period. The setting in which the device is detonated has
implications on the type of injuries sustained by survivors. The injuries
sustained by victims of suicide bombing attacks in semi-confined spaces are
characterized by the degree and extent of widespread tissue damage and include
multiple penetrating wounds of varying severity and location, blast injury, and
burns.
Conclusions:
Terrorism is designed to cause panic, chaos and,
optimally, publicity for a cause. Suicide terrorism is effective not only
because of its lethal outcome; it also sends the message that the cause is so
dire that death is a better outcome than life for the bomber. The level of
commitment is astounding and largely considered rational the approach to
victims of suicide bombings is based on the guidelines for trauma management.
Attention is given to the moderately injured, as these patients may harbor
immediate life-threatening injuries. The concept of damage control can be modified
to include rapid packing of multiple soft-tissue entry sites. Optimal
utilization of manpower and resources is achieved by recruiting all available
personnel, adopting a predetermined plan, and a centrally coordinated approach.
Suicide bombing attacks seriously challenge the most experienced medical
facilities.
The number and extent of worldwide suicide attacks has
risen sharply in recent years.
Popularized by militant Islamic organizations to
terrorize buses in Israel, the utilization of suicide bombers has been adopted
by other groups. Suicide bombing attacks illustrate the ability of suicide
attackers to mingle within a crowd and detonate an explosive device in the
vicinity of their victims. The injuries sustained by survivors of these well-planned
attacks combine the lethal effects of penetrating trauma, blast injury, and
burns.
PART FOUR
1. DEFINITION
Suicide
bombing also known as human bombing According to Nawaf Hail is the person acts
(Mujahedeen) filling his bag or his car by explosive, or straps explosives to
his body and attack the enemies in their place, so that the person most likely
has been killed. And according to Muhammad Hamah Al-Qaeda is the action of
mujahedeen who threw himself at death for heavy duty, with most likely didn’t
survive, but can bring substantial benefits to the Muslims.
Here what I
write is not like the suicide bombing that against the backdrop of despair, but
that is the activities are motivated by offender that the act is a form of
struggle to fight the truth.
2. Who
was the first suicide bomber?(HISTORY)
During the
Crusades, the Knights Templar destroyed one of their own ships, killing 140
Christians in order to kill ten times as many Muslims. Another early example of
suicide bombing occurred during the Belgian Revolution, when the Dutch
Lieutenant Jan van Speijk detonated his own ship in the harbour of Antwerp to
prevent being captured by the Belgians.
Modern
suicide bombing as a political tool can be traced back to the assisination of
Czar Alexander II of Russia in 1881. Alexander fell victim to a Nihilist plot.
While driving on one of the central streets of St. Petersburg, near the Winter
Palace, he was mortally wounded by the explosion of hand-made grenades and died
a few hours afterwards. The Czar was killed by the Pole Ignacy Hryniewiecki
(1856-1881), who died while intentionally exploding the bomb during the attack.
The
ritual act of self-sacrifice during combat appeared in a large scale at the end
of World War II with the Japanese kamikaze bombers.
A suicide
attack is an attack upon a target, in which an attacker intends to kill others
and/or cause great damage, knowing that he or she will either certainly or most
likely die in the process. Between 1981 and 2006, 1200
suicide attacks occurred around the world, constituting 4% of all terrorist
attacks but 32% (14,599 people) of all terrorism related deaths. 90% of these
attacks occurred in Iraq, Israel, Afghanistan, Pakistan or Sri Lanka.
Although
use of suicide attacks has occurred throughout recent history —
particularly with the Japanese kamikaze pilots of World War II — its main notoriety as a
specific kind of attack began in the 1980s and involved explosives deliberately
carried to the target either on the person or in a civilian vehicle and
delivered by surprise. Following the success of a 1983 truck
bombing of two barracks buildings in Beirut that killed 300 and
helped drive American and French Multinational
Force troops from Lebanon, the tactic spread to insurgent
groups like the Tamil Tigers of Sri Lanka,
and Islamist groups such as Hamas.
3. Affectivity of
Human Bombing
Our dataset
contains detailed information on all suicide attacks by Palestinians against
Israeli targets in Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip between September
2000 and August 2005. The Israeli Security Agency reports cover 151 suicide
bombing attacks carried out by 168 suicide bombers in Israel, the West Bank,
and Gaza. In the 151 suicide attacks included in the dataset, 515 Israelis were
killed and 3,428 were injured. According to the ISA, there were about 25,000
Palestinian attacks against Israeli citizens and residents between September
2000 and August 2005. In those attacks, more than 1,000 Israelis were killed.
While suicide attacks account for only 0.6 percent of the total number of
attacks, the number of Israelis who were killed in suicide attacks is more than
half the number of all Israelis killed in Palestinian attacks during this
period. We restrict our sample to attacks in which we have information about
the age and education of suicide bombers. We also exclude suicide attacks that
were launched by non-Palestinians or in which we could not identify the target.
We thus end up with 135 suicide bombing attacks carried out by 148 suicide
bombers. Our sample represents 89 percent of the total number of suicide
attacks between September 2000 and August 2005, 88 percent of the suicide
bombers, and 98 percent of the Israelis who were killed in suicide attacks.
Figure 1
displays the number of suicide attacks, number of people killed, and number of
those who were injured in suicide attacks from September 2000 to August 2005.
The al-Aqsa intifada began on September 29, 2000, and thus there were fewer
suicide attacks in the year 2000. (Intifada is an Arabic word for
uprising—literally translated as “shaking off.”) There were 60 suicide attacks
in 2002 (55 are included in our sample), almost twice as many as the number of
attacks in 2001 and 2003. The number of suicide attacks gradually declined in
the years 2004 and 2005.
There is a
positive correlation between the number of suicide attacks and the number of
people killed and injured in these attacks. For example, in 2000, our sample
contained three suicide attacks in which there were no casualties. In contrast,
in 2002 there are 55 suicide attacks in our sample that killed 216 and injured
1,308 people. The correlation between the number of suicide attacks and the
number of people killed in these attacks within a year is 0.95. Likewise, the
correlation between the number of suicide attacks and the number of people
injured in these attacks within a year is 0.95. Finally, the correlation
between the number of people killed and the number of those who were injured in
suicide attacks within a year is 0.94. (All correlations are significant at the
1 percent level.)
Suicide Bombing
Table 1
reports detailed summary statistics for the number of people killed and injured
in suicide attacks. The mean number of individuals killed in a suicide attack
in the full sample is 3.7; the mean number injured is 24.2. In our sample, 39.9
percent of the suicide attacks were carried out by Hamas; 25.7 percent by the
Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ); 26.4 percent by the Fatah; 5.4 percent by the
Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP); and 2.7 percent by other
organizations. Hamas and the PIJ, the two Islamic Palestinian terrorist
organizations, together carried out 65.5 percent of the suicide attacks in our
sample.
4. Types
of suicide attack
Suicide
attack on foot: explosive belt, satchel charge: many, including the assassination of
Rajiv Gandhi
Attempted
suicide attack with a plane as target: Richard Reid on American Airlines
Flight 63
Explosives
hidden inside the body: 2009 attack on Saudi Prince Muhammad bin Nayef
Suicide car bomb: 1983 Beirut
barracks bombing, Sri Lankan Central Bank bombing, numerous
incidents in Iraq since 2003
Suicide
attack by a boat with explosives: USS Cole bombing attacks in
Aden, Yemen by Al-Qaeda; SLNS Sagarawardena sinking
in Sri Lanka by Tamil Tigers.
Suicide
attack by a submarine with explosives (human-steered torpedo): Kaiten, used by Japan in World War II
Suicide
attack by a bicycle with explosives: Assassination of Sri Lankan
President Ranasinghe Premadasa by
the Liberation
Tigers of Tamil Elam (LTTE)
Suicide
attack by a hijacked commercial jet airliner with fuel: September 11 attacks,
possibly Air France Flight 8969 and
attempted by Samuel Bick
Suicide
attack by private plane: 2010 Austin plane
crash
Suicide
attack by diverting a bus to an abyss: Tel Aviv
Jerusalem bus 405 attack
Suicide
attack with guns: Insurgent attack on the Indian Parliament in December 2001,
killing 15 people; Anuradhapura massacre which
killed 146 people.
Suicide
attack by a car by using a fast driving car to drive intentionally into a crowd
of people or breaching a security barrier: 2009
attack on the Dutch royal family
5. Motivation
Of Suicide Bomber
A
September 2003 article published in the Jaffa Center for Strategic Studies
Strategic Assessment addressed Palestinian suicide terrorists. In this study
the authors, Shaul Kimhi and Samuel Even, developed a typology of suicide
terrorists acting against Israel.
The study identified four prototypes of suicide
terrorists: the religious fanatic, the nationalist fanatic, the revenge seeker,
and the exploited. Although the study was specifically addressing Palestinian
suicide terrorists, their analysis is also applicable to other terrorists.[37]
Prototype
|
Prerequisites
|
Supporting factor
|
Hypotheses as to the Prototype’s Dominant personality Traits
|
Religious Fantastic
|
· Religious indoctrination
encouraging and urging suicide attack
· Charismatic religious
leaders with great influence on candidates for suicide operations.
|
· A sympathetic public
atmosphere within includes publicity, great honor, and commemoration.
· A group that is
characterized by intensive process of collective thought.
· Community support of the
family of the deceased suicide terrorist.
|
Faithful, steadfast, goal-focused, belief in divinely determined fate,
influenced by people whom s/he reveres, belief in the world to come
|
Nationalist Fanatic
|
· Well-developed political
consciousness, along with sense of an uncompromising struggle to
|
· Participation pf the
organization twitch the individual belongs in the suicide attack.
· A sympathetic public
atmosphere that prises the searifice
|
· Steadfast, sure in
his/her ways, willing to searifiee him/herself for the general public
(idealist)
|
a. Idealism
The doctrine of asymmetric warfare views
suicide attacks as a result of an imbalance of power, in which groups with
little significant power resort to suicide bombing as a convenient tactic (see
advantages noted above) to demoralize the targeted civilians or government
leadership of their enemies. Suicide bombing may also take place as a perceived
response to actions or policies of a group with greater power. Groups which
have significant power have no need to resort to suicide bombing to achieve
their aims; consequently, suicide bombing is overwhelmingly used by guerrillas,
and other irregular fighting forces.
Among many such groups, there are religious overtones to martyrdom: attackers
and their supporters may believe that their sacrifice will be rewarded in
an afterlife. Suicide attackers often believe that
their actions are in accordance with moral or social standards because they are
aimed at fighting forces and conditions that they perceive as unjust.
b. POLITICAL
OCCUPATION
According to Robert Pape, director of the Chicago Project on
Suicide Terrorism, 95% of suicide attacks in recent times have the same
specific strategic goal: to cause an occupying state to withdraw forces from a
disputed territory.[38]
Robert Pape's studies have found that suicide
attacks are most often provoked by political occupation. Pape found the
targeted countries were ones where the government was democratic and public
opinion played a role in determining policy. Other characteristics Pape found
included a difference in religion between the attackers and occupiers, and that
there was grassroots support for the attacks. Attackers were disproportionately
from the educated middle classes. Characteristics which Pape thought to be
correlated to suicide bombing and bombers included: Islam, especially the
influence of Salafi Islam; brutality and cruelty of the
occupiers; competition among militant groups; and poverty, immaturity, poor
education, past history of suicide attempts, or social maladjustment of the
attackers.[39]
In targeting potential recruits for suicide terrorism,
it must be understood that terrorist attacks will not be prevented by trying to
profile terrorists. They are not sufficiently different from everyone else.
Insights into homegrown jiahdi attacks will have to come from understanding
group dynamics, not individual psychology. Small-group dynamics can trump
individual personality to produce horrific behavior in otherwise ordinary
people.
When suicide bombing is simply strategic suicide
Suicide bombers are rarely effective in achieving
larger goals.
And once the initial shock wears off the brutality of
such attacks rallies public opinion against the perpetrators.
The entire
world was spooked by the March 29 attack by two Chechen "black widow"
suicide bombers who killed 38 people in the Moscow subway. As far away as New
York, police squads armed with assault weapons were deployed to prevent a
copycat strike
There is no
doubt that suicide attacks can be deadly -- and terrifying. But are they
effective in furthering the larger goals of the attackers? Osama bin Laden
& Co. would like us to think so. Jihadists crow that they "love
death" while the West "loves life," giving them an insuperable
advantage that no conventional army can overcome. Some Western analysts have
added to the hype by arguing, in essence, that suicide attacks are a "poor
man's smart bomb" and a tactic against which democratic states have only
one recourse: giving in to the bombers' demands.
Actually,
the most comprehensive database of post-1980 suicide attacks -- compiled by
Robert Pape of the University of Chicago -- suggests a very different
conclusion. Terrifying as it is, suicide bombing is a tactic with a very low
rate of return. As far as I can tell, there has been only one successful
campaign utilizing primarily suicide attacks -- that waged by Hezbollah in the
early 1980s to drive foreign peacekeepers out of Lebanon. In 1983, Hezbollah
blew up the U.S. Embassy in Beirut and both the U.S. Marine and French army
barracks, killing 362 people. Because neither the U.S. nor France felt a keen
strategic stake in Lebanon, these deaths were enough to drive them out.
Hezbollah
suicide bombers also killed 197 Israeli soldiers between 1982 and 1985 -- but
with less impact. True, Israel withdrew from most of Lebanon, but it would have
done so even had there been no suicide bombings. International outrage over the
1982 Sabra and Shatila massacre, when Lebanese militiamen allied with Israel
slaughtered hundreds of Palestinians, was a more important blow against Israel
than any car bomb.
When Israel
gave up its buffer zone in southern Lebanon in 2000, it was because of attacks
by Hezbollah fighters who were skilled guerrillas but hardly suicidal. In fact,
they often escaped after ambushing an Israeli patrol. In 2006, Israel fought
Hezbollah again -- and again Hezbollah acquitted itself well on the battlefield
without resorting to widespread suicide bombings. This time, Hezbollah's most
important weapon was the rockets it fired into northern Israel.
By moving
away from suicide tactics, Hezbollah was tacitly conceding their limited
efficacy. That lesson was driven home by the second intifada, launched in 2000.
Palestinians with explosives belts blew up a Tel Aviv nightclub (22 dead), a
Haifa restaurant (21) and a Jerusalem bus stop (20), among other targets.
Yet by 2004
the intifada was over. Suicide bombings have not been a serious threat to
Israel since. This is because of the effectiveness of countermeasures such as
erecting a security barrier along the West Bank and searching just about
everyone entering a public premise in Israel, combined with targeted operations
to arrest or kill militant leaders. Having seen their suicide campaign blunted,
Hamas, like Hezbollah, decided to shift to rocket attacks, which could fly over
Israeli defenses.
A similar
lack of success has crowned efforts to drive the U.S. out of Iraq. Starting
with the explosion that blew up the U.N. headquarters in Baghdad on Aug. 19,
2003, Sunni terrorists staged the most costly campaign of suicide terrorism
ever conducted, utilizing primarily cars and trucks, which can pack far more
explosives than an individual bomber. They brought Iraq to the brink of civil
war, but in 2007-08 they were largely defeated by American and Iraqi troops who
erected concrete barriers and checkpoints around Baghdad and surged into the
neighborhoods where terrorists hid.
Scattered
bombs continue to go off in Iraq, but there is not, as the terrorists like to
claim, a limitless supply of martyrs. As the war dragged on, there were
increasing reports that suicide bombers had been either blackmailed or duped
into setting off their explosives.
That the ordinary jihadist was hardly suicidal was
confirmed by the fact that their most common weapon was the roadside bomb,
which usually allowed the culprits plenty of time to escape.
Just as Al
Qaeda, Iraq has failed to defeat the U.S. and its allies, so too the larger Al
Qaeda organization has not achieved its primary strategic objectives following
the deadliest suicide attack of all -- 9/11. Al Qaeda has not toppled any
Middle Eastern regimes, much less established a fundamentalist caliphate. It
is, arguably, further from achieving those goals today than it was before 2001,
because the barbarism of its attacks spurred the United States and its allies
to mobilize in response.
PART FIVE
OPINION OF THE SCHOLARS (ULAMA)
The
activists movement of the hizbiyyah who act the good deeds and the spirit of
capital only did not try to solve a problem scientifically besade view of the
hadeeth of Al-Qur’an and sunnah of the prophet Solallahu’alaihiwasallam and not
make scholar Rabbani as a reference, causing them to defend the practice of
this vanity.
The
scholars were trying to support the argument without put it in the real place.
Not even a little of them humbled fatwa that prohibits this practice by stating
“they are the scholars who don’t know the condition, they just menstrual
problems and postpartum care only. And for Jihad there are the scholars for it”
Oh may God…
It turns
out that they regard as scholars is the “self-style scholars” who have thought
as Khawarij, Quthbiyah, and ikhwani as Salman Al-Audah, Sulaiman Al-Lawn,
Ibrahim Ad-Duwasy, Sa’id bin Musfir, Yusuf Al-Qardhawi, and atc. Even of among
them who expressed Ijma’ of scholars about allow it. This is the strange
appropriation, isn’t it? How might happen consensuses of the scholars in this
great act of defiance, such as Al-Alamah Muhammad Al-Albanian Nashiruddin, Alus
Shaikh Abdul Aziz, Muhammad bin Salih Al-Utaymeen, and etc.
Al-Alamah
Muhammad bin Shalih Al-Utsaimin said:
“as for
what have the human done as suicide bombing by bringing exploisive (bomb) to
the bunch of infidels, then put it after being in the midst of them, in fact
this is includes suicide.
Whoever killed him, then he conserved and perpetuated in Hell forever as contained in
the hadith of the Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wasallam. Therefore, suicide does
not provide benefit
for Islam because when he committed
suicide and killed ten or a
hundred or two hundred (the unbelievers), it is
not beneficial to Islam with the actions in
which people do not get into Islam. Differen from the
story of young man.
And may be,
that happens it will be more violent enemy resistance and made their blood
boil. So that the many are the Muslims who were killed as found from the
treatment of the Jewish population of Palestine. If the death of one of them
with this blasting causes and killed six, seven, then they took from the
Muslims(because of it) sixty people or more so it does not bring benefits to
the Muslims and not beneficial to the blown up in the ranks them.
So thay
way, we see, what is done by most people in the form of suicide, we assume that
it is the right and kill the soul without causing the entry into hell. And the
culprit is not a martyr. But if someone did that with the assumption that it
should, then we hope that he is safe from sin. As for when it is considered a
martyr, it is not so.
It is
because, he did not take the real way to martyrdom. And who ijtihad and he was
wrong, then for him the reward.
A. Opinions that allow
Among
the contemporary scholars who allow suicide
bombing is:
1. Prof. Dr. Muhammad Az-Zuhaili (Dean
of the University of Damascus Faculty of Islamic Law).
2. Prof. Wahbah Az-Zuhaili (Head of
Department of Fiqh and Usul Fiqh Sharia Faculty
of the University of Damascus).
3. Dr. Muhammad Said Ramadan Al-Buthi (Chairman
of the Department of Comparative Religion Theology and the
University of Damascus Faculty of Islamic Law).
4. Dr. Ali Ash-Shawi (Former Chairman
of the Department of Fiqh and Sharia Faculty
of Laws University of Jordan).
5. Dr. Hamam Said (Sharia Faculty
of the University of Jordan and the Jordanian Parliament).
6. Dr. Agil An-Nisyami (Dean of
the Faculty of Islamic Law at Kuwait University).
7. Dr. Abdur Raziq Asy-Syaiji (Professor
of the Faculty of Sharia College of Kuwait).
8. Qurra Shaykh ash-Sham ash-Shaykh Muhammad Karim rajih (scholars Syrians).
9. Shaykh
al-Azhar (Shaykh Muhammad Sayyed Tanthawi).
10. Shaykh Muhammad Mutawalli Sha'rawi (Egyptian cleric).
11. Fathi Yakan (Muslim
Brotherhood activist propaganda).
12. Dr. Al-Qadah nerve (Jordanian cleric).
13. Dr. Yusuf al-Qaradawi (Qatar scholars).
Dr. Khair Muhammad Haikal (Hizb ut-Tahrir activist
propaganda).
14. Shaykh Abdullah bin Hamid (Former Chief
Justice of Makkah Al-Mukarramah).
The proof for this group
that allow, among others:
Allah said:
إِنَّ اللَّهَ اشْتَرَى مِنَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ أَنْفُسَهُمْ وَأَمْوَالَهُمْ بِأَنَّ لَهُمُ الْجَنَّةَ يُقَاتِلُونَ فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ فَيَقْتُلُونَ وَيُقْتَلُونَ وَعْدًا عَلَيْهِ حَقًّا فِي التَّوْرَاةِ وَالْإِنْجِيلِ وَالْقُرْآَنِ (التوبة : 111)
Meaning
“Allah
hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in
return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are
slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the
Qur’an: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in
the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme”
Point of this paragraph is the
argument, that the war in the way of Allah has
a great risk of death. Though death is something that
is likely or definitely will be happened
in humans bombing. But even
so, God still commanded and gives reward of
heaven for those who carry it out. Divine command shows
the permission of God to execute.
Word of
God:
فَلْيُقَاتِلْ فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ الَّذِينَ يَشْرُونَ الْحَيَاةَ الدُّنْيَا بِالْآَخِرَةِ وَمَنْ يُقَاتِلْ فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ فَيُقْتَلْ أَوْ يَغْلِبْ فَسَوْفَ نُؤْتِيهِ أَجْرًا عَظِيمًا (النساء :74)
Meaning
“Let
those fight in the cause of Allah who sell the life of this world for the
hereafter. To him who fighteth in the cause of Allah, - whether he is slain or
gets victory – Soon shall We give him a reward of great (value).”
Mentioned in this
statement that Allah rewards those who are
slain equate to reward those who are able to
defeat the enemy for defending the religion of Allah. And
the people who do the bombing of man, in this
case belongs to the category of people who are slain in
Allah's way before, not among those who committed
suicide. Suppose because of those who commit
suicide, God will not give you a
great reward for him, but instead will
be put into hell.
Word of
God:
وَأَنْفِقُوا فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ وَلَا تُلْقُوا بِأَيْدِيكُمْ إِلَى التَّهْلُكَةِ وَأَحْسِنُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُحِبُّ الْمُحْسِنِينَ (البقرة : 195)
Meaning
“and spend of your substance in the cause of
Allah, and make not your own hands contribute to (your) destruction; but do
good; for Allah Lovett those who do good” (Al-Baqoroh :195)
This paragraph does
not prohibit the activity in the way
of Allah that war can
make them killed. Or in other words, allow such a
war activity. And humans including
the bombing war activities that can make the
perpetrator killed. This understanding is based on
the explanation Companions named Abu Ayyub al-Ansari that corrects a
wrong understanding of the verses, which is
understood as a prohibition to sacrifice them in
battle.
Ibn Kathir in his
tafsir commenting on the above verse by
quoting a hadith below:
قال رجل للبراء بن عازب إن حملت على العدو وحدي فقتلوني أكنت ألقيت بيدي إلى التهلكة قال لا قال الله لرسوله ( فقاتل في سبيل الله لا تكلف إلا نفسك ) وإنما هذه في النفقة. (رواه الحاكم)
A
man said to Barra'bin 'Azib: if I strike my
enemies alone then they kill me, if
I had "caused me harm", he said: "No, God has
said to the apostles: (then fight in the way
of Allah, it is not but you're burdened with the
obligation of your own) this verse was true in the case
of living.
Imam
Al-Qurtubi in his commentary book tells that Abu Ayyub al-Ansari said that the
"cause himself harm" referred to in the paragraph is abandoned jihad
in Allah's path. And what is meant by dropping themselves into perdition is our
busy taking care of possessions and abandoned jihad.
Al-Qaeda concluded, that as
such, this verse shows allowing risked their lives
in battle, though sure would have been
killed. Human bombings including the type
of activity like this.
Word of god
وَأَعِدُّوا لَهُمْ مَا اسْتَطَعْتُمْ مِنْ قُوَّةٍ وَمِنْ رِبَاطِ الْخَيْلِ تُرْهِبُونَ بِهِ عَدُوَّ اللَّهِ وَعَدُوَّكُمْ وَآَخَرِينَ مِنْ دُونِهِمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَهُمُ اللَّهُ يَعْلَمُهُمْ (الانفال :60)
Meaning
“Against
them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of
war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your
enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know.
Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of Allah, shall be repaid unto you, and ye
shall not be treated unjustly”.
Yusuf Al-Qaradawi said that
the bombings, including for the greatest form
of jihad. This action includes the acts of
terror (Irhab) as indicated in the paragraph above.
Prophet
Muhammad hadith narrated by Imam Muslim as follows
1789 وحدثنا هداب بن خالد الأزدي حدثنا حماد بن سلمة عن علي بن زيد وثابت البناني عن أنس بن مالك * أن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم أفرد يوم أحد في سبعة من الأنصار ورجلين من قريش فلما رهقوه قال من يردهم عنا وله الجنة أو هو رفيقي في الجنة فتقدم رجل من الأنصار فقاتل حتى قتل ثم رهقوه أيضا فقال من يردهم عنا وله الجنة أو هو رفيقي في الجنة فتقدم رجل من الأنصار فقاتل حتى قتل فلم يزل كذلك حتى قتل السبعة فقال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم لصاحبيه ما أنصفنا أصحابنا
It was
narrated from Anas ibn Malik that the Prophet
once at the Battle of
Uhud with only seven Ansar and two men of Quraysh. When
the enemy approached the Prophet, he said,
"Whoever could get rid of them from us, he will go
to heaven, or he with me in
paradise." Then one person from
the Ansar forward and fought until
the fall. Approaching enemy again and again the
Prophet said, "Whoever could get rid
of them from us, he will go to
heaven, or he with me in paradise." Then one person from
the Ansar forward and fought until
the fall. And this continues until the seven Ansar were
killed
When
the Prophet said, "Whoever could get rid
of them from us, he will go to
heaven" is a sign that they will
be killed in the cause of Allah, and in this
case it is almost
certain death. This event shows to
allow sacrifice themselves in war-such as suicide
bombings-the belief will die in the way of Allah.
The basics
mentioned above become the foundation for scholars who allow suicide bombing.
In summary, they consider suicide bombing suicide is not the same as usual;
suicide bombings in their view is a form of sacrifice of a Muslim for his
religion, as was the case in the wars against the infidels who is clearly a
Muslim lives at stake , even in the many wars that the number of Muslim far
fewer than the number of the enemy, according to rational calculations it can
be said that the Muslims tried to kill himself by force against a much larger
amount
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar